<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paul Lomax - Two Point Oh &#187; Internet Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twopointoh.co.uk/category/internet-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twopointoh.co.uk</link>
	<description>Paul Lomax used to blog about Web 2.0, now he just tweets and shares content...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 16:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='twopointoh.co.uk' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://twopointoh.co.uk/osd.xml" title="Paul Lomax - Two Point Oh" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://twopointoh.co.uk/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Simple guide to trademarks and Google adwords</title>
		<link>http://twopointoh.co.uk/2007/01/16/simple-guide-to-trademarks-and-google-adwords/</link>
		<comments>http://twopointoh.co.uk/2007/01/16/simple-guide-to-trademarks-and-google-adwords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lomax</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointoh.wordpress.com/2007/01/16/simple-guide-to-trademarks-and-google-adwords/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following a rumour that circulated our offices that you can protect your trademark with Google for a fee, I wrote this brief guide to explain the latest thinking regarding trademarks and paid search, specifically Google Adwords. The latest thinking is that an advert is deemed ‘legal’ if Keyword-triggered ad copy doesn’t display the trademarks. ie [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=twopointoh.co.uk&#038;blog=651163&#038;post=43&#038;subd=twopointoh&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following a rumour that circulated our offices that you can protect your trademark with Google for a fee, I wrote this brief guide to explain the latest thinking regarding trademarks and paid search, specifically Google Adwords.</p>
<p>The <a target="_blank" href="http://www.out-law.com/page-6775%20-">latest thinking</a> is that an advert is deemed ‘legal’ if</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Keyword-triggered ad copy doesn’t display the trademarks.</strong> ie Heat could buy an ad word campaign using the key word Now Magazine but if the advert copy that they put up didn&#8217;t contain the words &#8220;Now magazine&#8221; it would be considered &#8220;legal&#8221;. We could still however complain to Google and try and get it taken down.</li>
<li><strong>Search results don’t display the trademarks even though the trademarks were included in the keyword metatags (or similar).</strong> This is if a competitor were to come up high in the natural search rankings for our trademark &#8211; but again if they don&#8217;t use our trademark in their copy &#8211; the ad would be considered legal. Again a course of action would be to complain to Google.</li>
</ul>
<p>You cannot protect your trademark in Google for a fee, to my knowledge. Of course you could pay to advertise on that keyword yourself, paying more per click than the competitor (<em>but please don’t &#8211; it just lines Google’s pockets!</em>)</p>
<p>The first thing to do would be to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.co.uk/tm_complaint.html">complain to Google</a> about any trademark infringement.</p>
<p>They may consider removing an advert which is triggered on a keyword but are not legally obliged to &#8211; however, they will almost definitely remove an advert which includes a trademark within the ad copy.</p>
<p>The exception to this is when an advert is triggered by non-trademarked terms even though the search query contains a trademarked item – for example if somebody has sponsored ‘magazine’ and appear when somebody searches for ‘now magazine’ then they probably won’t pull the ad.</p>
<p>NB: <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IANAL" title="I Am Not A Lawyer">IANAL</a></p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/twopointoh.wordpress.com/43/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/twopointoh.wordpress.com/43/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/twopointoh.wordpress.com/43/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/twopointoh.wordpress.com/43/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/twopointoh.wordpress.com/43/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/twopointoh.wordpress.com/43/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/twopointoh.wordpress.com/43/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/twopointoh.wordpress.com/43/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/twopointoh.wordpress.com/43/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/twopointoh.wordpress.com/43/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/twopointoh.wordpress.com/43/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/twopointoh.wordpress.com/43/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/twopointoh.wordpress.com/43/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/twopointoh.wordpress.com/43/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/twopointoh.wordpress.com/43/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/twopointoh.wordpress.com/43/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=twopointoh.co.uk&#038;blog=651163&#038;post=43&#038;subd=twopointoh&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://twopointoh.co.uk/2007/01/16/simple-guide-to-trademarks-and-google-adwords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2e1f96c4d20baca0a548fb791e169f66?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">paullomax</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trademark use in keyword advertising</title>
		<link>http://twopointoh.co.uk/2007/01/08/trademark-use-in-keyword-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://twopointoh.co.uk/2007/01/08/trademark-use-in-keyword-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lomax</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointoh.wordpress.com/2007/01/08/trademark-use-in-keyword-advertising/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The use of trademarks in keyword advertising has been the subject of much confusion, talk and litigation over the years, and Google&#8217;s stance on the matter hasn&#8217;t been particularly firm of late. While still not completely resolved (particularly in the UK courts), the latest thinking from a US court ruling is quite clear and fairly [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=twopointoh.co.uk&#038;blog=651163&#038;post=31&#038;subd=twopointoh&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of trademarks in keyword advertising has been the subject of <a target="_blank" href="http://news.com.com/Google+wins+in+trademark+suit+with+Geico/2100-1024_3-5491704.html" title="Google wins in trademark suit with Geico">much confusion</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20050331/135200.shtml" title="American Blinds Suit Against Google Moves Forward">talk </a>and <a target="_blank" href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/060214-094457" title="Check 'n Go Sues Google Over Keyword Trademarks">litigation</a> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.out-law.com/page-1341" title="Trade mark twist in the eToy story">over the years</a>, and <a target="_blank" href="https://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=6118" title="What is Google's trademark policy? ">Google&#8217;s stance </a>on the matter hasn&#8217;t been <a target="_blank" href="http://www.out-law.com/page-4476" title="Google ignoring trade marks in keyword sales">particularly firm</a> of late.</p>
<p>While still not completely resolved (particularly in the UK courts), the latest thinking from a <a target="_blank" href="http://claranet.scu.edu/tempfiles/tmp29955/jgwentworthsettlementfundingjan07.pdf" title="J.G. Wentworth v. Settlement Funding">US court ruling</a> is quite clear and fairly sensible &#8211; but mostly in favour of advertisers and not trademark holders. As <a target="_blank" href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2007/01/keyword_ads_and.htm" title="Keyword Ads and Metatags Don't Confuse Consumers">Eric Goldman summarises </a>succinctly:</p>
<blockquote><p>The use of keyword-triggered ads and keyword metatags cannot confuse consumers if the resulting ads/search results don&#8217;t display the plaintiff&#8217;s trademarks</p></blockquote>
<p>So basically, the latest view is that an advert is deemed &#8216;legal&#8217; if</p>
<ul>
<li>keyword-triggered ad copy doesn&#8217;t display the trademarks</li>
<li>search results don&#8217;t display the trademarks even though the trademarks were included in the keyword metatags</li>
</ul>
<p>You cannot protect your trademark in Google for a fee &#8211; be wary of anyone claiming to offer such a service. Of course you could pay to advertise on that keyword yourself, paying more per click than the competitor &#8211; but please don’t, it just <a target="_blank" href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/goog/3127465.htm" title="google Q3 Profit Nearly Doubles ">lines Google’s pockets</a>!</p>
<p>The first thing to do would be to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/tm_complaint_adwords.html" title="AdWords Trademark Complaint Procedure ">complain to Google about any trademark infringement</a>. They may consider removing an advert which is triggered on a keyword but are not legally obliged to. However they will almost definitely remove an advert which includes a trademark within the ad copy – <em>except</em> when an advert is triggered by non-trademarked terms even though the search query contains a trademarked item – for example if somebody has sponsored ‘shoes&#8217; and appear when somebody searches for ‘nike shoes&#8217; then they won’t pull the ad.</p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/twopointoh.wordpress.com/31/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/twopointoh.wordpress.com/31/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/twopointoh.wordpress.com/31/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/twopointoh.wordpress.com/31/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/twopointoh.wordpress.com/31/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/twopointoh.wordpress.com/31/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/twopointoh.wordpress.com/31/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/twopointoh.wordpress.com/31/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/twopointoh.wordpress.com/31/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/twopointoh.wordpress.com/31/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/twopointoh.wordpress.com/31/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/twopointoh.wordpress.com/31/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/twopointoh.wordpress.com/31/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/twopointoh.wordpress.com/31/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/twopointoh.wordpress.com/31/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/twopointoh.wordpress.com/31/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=twopointoh.co.uk&#038;blog=651163&#038;post=31&#038;subd=twopointoh&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://twopointoh.co.uk/2007/01/08/trademark-use-in-keyword-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2e1f96c4d20baca0a548fb791e169f66?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">paullomax</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
